MirariNefas Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 (edited) Anyone consider using the V-22 Osprey as the initial troop carrier? They've finally finished testing, are designed for rapid cargo/troop movement, have vertical takeoff/landing capability, and fit precisely into the timeframe of the game. I suppose the models and so on for the troop carrier are already done, but after v1.0 I think a change towards realism in military equiptment would add to the atmosphere of the game. This gives a pretty good idea about how it would look in the battlescape, and the cargo capacity it could have.http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/sys...mages/v-22d.jpg The troop capacity seems too high for game balance though, so maybe it would be appropriate to call it the high performance version so extra fuel tanks would take up ten seats. Maybe change it to V-23. Edited January 24, 2006 by MirariNefas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 The current troop carrier aircraft is based on the v-22 somewhat, but uses ducted, afterburning turbofans instead of rotors. We will not be using the v-22 because it is much too slow to circumnavigate the globe in any reasonable amount of time. The original skyranger was transonic, so I wanted a design that was at least capable of transonic flight in order to fill its role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snakeman Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 (edited) Yea, I'm partial to the V-22 as well, mostly cause I think it just looks really neat. I don't know about its use though. I suspect given how fast things need responding to in the game, it'd probably have to have a more specific use tied to it. Such as reinforcements during a battle, or for visiting terror sites or crash sites. I couldn't ever see them in an intercepting role though. Stuff's flying too fast for that. I had a post as well about them at the tail end of this thread here: http://www.xcomufo.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2019&st=70 Edit: The first link still works out of the 4 I listed, but the rest must have gotten rearranged somewhere. Edited January 24, 2006 by Snakeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirariNefas Posted January 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 (edited) Ah well, you're right about the speed issue. I've heard talk of missions where the aliens try to attack your supply ships. If this makes it in, may I suggest utelizing the V-22 for the supply ships? It occurs to me that X-CORP underground bases don't have runways, so 747's won't do. Besides, the small fast V-22s would be much better for keeping the low profile requisite in supplying a hidden base. Edited January 26, 2006 by MirariNefas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 With all that air traffic radar? I would just assume that the xcom base would be supplied by truck just like everyone else. I think that the condors would suit that role just fine in any event... but does the X-corps really have 50 billion dollars to spend on a fleet of military aircraft to deliver the mail and toiletries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snakeman Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 $50k for a toilet seat, now that's government spending for you Back to the subject, the way I've been picturing the possible use of the V-22 is not too dissimilar to something like the Lightening when you research that. Limited range and fuel, best used for actions nearest our bases. But while something like the Lightening could traverse aproximately half the globe before needing to return to base, the V-22 could have a range a fraction of that, like maybe a quarter of the globe or something (like maybe it could traverse most of a continent but not all of it). Or leave a bit of space to improve the V-22 one more step before going to the next new thing i.e. Lose the propellers and add jet engines, then it becomes a supersonic transport slightly under par of the Skyranger. I just like the idea of seeing more technological progression in these kinds of games beginning with something familiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Add jet engine to an osprey and you get the current condor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirariNefas Posted January 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 (edited) Add jet engine to an osprey and you get the current condor <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Um, no. Compare Condor to V-22 They're pretty much nothing alike. Once again, I'll point out that these bases do not have runways. With all that air traffic radar? I would just assume that the xcom base would be supplied by truck just like everyone else. Most X-CORP bases will probably be in rural areas without road access, and it would be a simple matter for an advanced organization like X-CORP to use stealth materials to stay off radar. Also, the Condor would quite obviously have a much larger radar profile. Edited January 26, 2006 by MirariNefas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Add jet engine to an osprey and you get the current condor <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Um, no. Compare Condor to V-22 They're pretty much nothing alike. Once again, I'll point out that these bases do not have runways. With all that air traffic radar? I would just assume that the xcom base would be supplied by truck just like everyone else. For one thing, most X-CORP bases will probably be in rural areas without road access, and it would be a simple matter for an advanced organization like X-CORP to use stealth materials to stay off radar. Also, the Condor would quite obviously have a much larger radar profile.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Our Condor model is not the AN-124, whatever that is, ours is made up, it doesn't exist <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirariNefas Posted January 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Ah, my mistake. I was wondering why in the world he'd be arguing for a stupid russian cargo plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 I guess people of his user group cannot access the workshops. I can drop a jpg render of what the Condor looks like, if such a thing is permissable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 I guess people of his user group cannot access the workshops. I can drop a jpg render of what the Condor looks like, if such a thing is permissable.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>They can, read access to Forum Members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 No thanks. I can take your word for it. http://www.xcomufo.com/forums/index.php?ac...pe=post&id=8191 http://www.xcomufo.com/forums/index.php?ac...pe=post&id=8193 http://www.xcomufo.com/forums/index.php?ac...pe=post&id=8190 Early shots of the model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snakeman Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 Looks cool. Yea, that does look like it could possibly be in the family of Osprey, futuristically speaking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirariNefas Posted January 27, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 Kinda reminds me of the Orca from C&C. Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-1 Posted February 4, 2006 Report Share Posted February 4, 2006 Yeah, that's incredibly ORCA-like. I loved those ORCAs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted February 5, 2006 Report Share Posted February 5, 2006 Heh. There are few things I hate more than to have my work compared to a precident work of art that had nothing to do with the influence of the design. It ought to look incredibly Osprey-like. Anyways, I just did an image search and I disagree that it looks 'incredibly orca-like', but I'm glad that it conjures fond memories of a game you used to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirariNefas Posted February 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2006 The resemblence is mostly in the first image, where wings that seperate the engines from the cockpit are obscured. The wings are Ospreyish, and the more streamlined form, as well as the engine type, are Orca-esque. I shall call it the Orcrey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-1 Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 (edited) Actually it's the second image that looks most like it to me. Don't worry, it already looks waaaaaaay better than an old early 1990s-era pixelation. EDIT: btw, the reason it may not appear orca like is that they added some different designs in the sequel like the orca transport and such, but we're referring to the original Tiberium Dawn ORCA. (God I HATE EA, thanks to them we'll never see a proper ending of the Tiberium saga, because we don't get the promised "Tiberium Twilight".) Edited February 11, 2006 by T-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Blehm 98] Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 I'm still patiently awaiting the arrival of Red alert 3, if it ever appears. *curses EA for screwing everything, including Westwood, up* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-1 Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Yeah, that wouldn't be that bad either, as long as they don't make something else like generals. On Topic: That ORCA does look nice though . I think I'll call it that from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now