mikker Posted June 30, 2003 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 (edited) you mean... ...like this? the upper edge, is because the highelst piece is thinner then the lower, so i have to isolate that area. The front piece is also thinner. Edited June 30, 2003 by mikker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 yeah kinda like that, now of those 3 triangles you have the one farthest towrd the muzzle try setting that in it's own shading group. Can you post it w/o the wireframe on this one so we can see how the shading groups are working now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted June 30, 2003 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 ok. ...it isn't better.....hmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 Ok, in the attached image the circled polys represent polys that need to be placed in separate shading groups to fix the striations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breunor Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 On Vaaish's last pic, perhaps if you unweld the far right poly in the red-circle group? That should help. You could try it on some of the others as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted July 21, 2003 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2003 (edited) nice pistol cubik. Improvements in the front: Edited July 21, 2003 by mikker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 25, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 a long awaited update on the laser pistol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 nice mikker! looks like the rendering could require some anti-aliasing though :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 looking good. Can I get a side view of that, there is something odd about the trigger guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpl. Facehugger Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 Wow. Amazing. But what is the craft laser cannon going to look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 (edited) THe pistol is coming along great! I have issues with the shape of the bottom of the handle. It seems clumsy... And I would like to suggest that you accentuate the change in shape of the upper receiver(sic) by putting in a ridge or a shelf that seperates it from the rounded top.... and then join the ridge to the square bit at the back... .....||_/===\_ |...(_)...||....O....|.\-------/...|.|.|.|...|.|_|.|...|......|...|......|...\----/ ../-----\----------------------------------|-\/..........\====================+|........................................................|]|........................................................|]\___________________|.................|..=................/.........||......|.................|....\............./..........//........\_______/.....|...........|=====....|...........|.../............|..|.............|..|.............|..|.............|.+----_____\ edit:working on appearance of ascii art. Edited January 25, 2004 by fux0r666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 26, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 looking good. Can I get a side view of that, there is something odd about the trigger guard.like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 perfect. the trigger guard looks awkward like they ran out of material to make it. try making it more like the trigger guard on a glock, eg more horizontal at the bottom portion and a starper turn to vertical. kinda like this: | | /_______/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzuchan Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 Also one slight nitpick that's been bothering me for quite a while...The trigger on the laser pistol looks like it'd slice open the finger of the person firing the pistol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puasonen Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 I like that model. I just wonder why is the previous version of it in deimos' topic "Completed Designs" if it wasn't even complete! Well anyways, good job mikker, can't wait to see that textured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breunor Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 The completed designs is for completed/approved concepts, not necessarily modeled, textured, and/or animated. Perhaps the trigger might seem better if it were solid, meaning that it goes straight back into the grip rather than being a seperate piece? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest drewid Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 If it was me doing it. I'd make the lines round the base of the handgrip look more parallel and deliberate, perhaps put a power pack in. I couldn't make out from this angle what the thing on the back of the forestock was.Handle straighter by moving the curve further up to the top, trigger and guard a bit beefier. feel free to use or ignore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 27, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 perhaps put a power pack in. I couldn't make out from this angle what the thing on the back of the forestock was.that piece WAS the power pack yes, i think that your trigger gard looks better. lemme look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 27, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 (edited) thanks for all the kind replys what about this? EDIT: fancy backpart Edited January 27, 2004 by mikker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 What the... what did you do with it? try to get it more like drewid's pic, not the opposite. It should be more bulky with a longer thicker handle and shorter back part... now it looks like the front part weights much more than the rest of the gun and makes it unbalanced to shoot with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpl. Facehugger Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 I like it Mikker, except for the funny thing right in front of the trigger guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puasonen Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 I agree with whitewashed, I don't understand what did you do to the handle! But I like that latest version too. It's cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicAndy Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 thicken up the handle and .... perfect! Now everyone take a look back at the first model ever done in this thread. ain't evolution fascinating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzuchan Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 Mikker:I know the usual is CTD change before model change, but since you're tweaking it anyway, here's something I'd like to bring to your attention... In the laser pistol CTD, I said that the part under the barrel is where the radiators for the laser core is, and that the primary capacitor is in the handle, which matches Drewid's concept... Which I also think looks much cooler... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breunor Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 So the extension in the front is a heat sink of sorts? I was also wondering what the switch/doodad in front of the trigger guard was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthraxus Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 Looks like a safety toggle switch to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 28, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 well, should i just delete it? or what? (for thte thingamabob) oooh, i though drewid commented on the SHAPE of the trigger guard. what about this then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 try to make the back of the gun and grip match what Drewid posted up there. now it looks liek the back is unaturally enlongated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puasonen Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 (edited) I agree with Vaaish, especially about the grip. Edited January 28, 2004 by Nyyperoid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed Posted January 28, 2004 Report Share Posted January 28, 2004 Yes, grip and back as on drewids pic, it looks like a mean gun that way :laser: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted January 29, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 i will see what i can do, but i acturly tried to get it like drewids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fux0r666 Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 The current pic makes the gun look very long and tall like a carbine almost. I would enlarge the handle and the trigger and trigger guard in order to scale the barrel down a bit. I like the proportions and the lines on the upper part better pre-drewids pic suggestions. If you could return the geometry to that configuration and encorperate drewid's suggestions, and perhaps lengthen the handle + make the trigger/guard larger, your design would look very convincing indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzuchan Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 well, should i just delete it? or what? (for thte thingamabob) Yeah, my recomendation would be to delete it... I remember that you initially put it there as the power pack, which should be in the pistol grip, if anywhere (Cause I wrote the CTD with the idea that the primary capacitor wasn''t designed to be swapped like a magazine in the first place...) I also agree with Fux's comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipperhead Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 doodle for the pistol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 doodle for the pistolyou might want to check the art assets list, the pistol is already complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 doodle for the pistolyou might want to check the art assets list, the pistol is already complete. Uh, I think he meant the pic as guidelines for the laser pistol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipperhead Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 what whitewashed said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaaish Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 in that case it looks way to much like a ballistic based handgun with a laser sight. there porbably wouldn't be a need for it to have the hammer on the read since there isn't a firing pin that needs to be hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipperhead Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 yeah, lose the cirle at the back, and the other thing coming out the back is the safty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted February 2, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 ok, i will take a twist of it. Though we might watch out for it bekomming too human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deimos Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Looks like the original concept is getting kind of devolved. Just as a reminder here's my original concept pic that Mikker was basing the model off. The bronze bit under the barrel is the high capacity 'battery' unit which slots in like a like a tape in a tape deck.I put the battery there to counterbalance the weight of the capacitors in the grip which I envisioned were quite heavy and threw the gun's weight off. Other than that the design was inspired by the DE for its size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Though we might watch out for it bekomming too human.Well, the laser weapons are 100% human, you know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted February 2, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Though we might watch out for it bekomming too human.Well, the laser weapons are 100% human, you know ok, then too "nowdays" human. it should be more "futoristic" human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzuchan Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 The bronze bit under the barrel is the high capacity 'battery' unit which slots in like a like a tape in a tape deck.I put the battery there to counterbalance the weight of the capacitors in the grip which I envisioned were quite heavy and threw the gun's weight off.Hmm...I'd figure that if the heaviest part (i.e. the capacitors) are placed almost directly over the grip, it'd be the most balanced design for a handgun style weapon, and as such, won't require a counter balance beneath the barrel(IMHO, that actually unbalances the gun). Given that gravity works straight down, having most of the weight concentrated in the grip works best as then it'll be easier to support the weight. The user'd just have to hold the weapon. If the weight of the gun was "spread out" the whole design, the user'd be force to support both the front and the back(Think of a lever with similiar weights over both ends with the user holding on to one end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deimos Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Forgive me if I got this wrong Tzuchan but it seems like you're saying pretty much what I said in my post. The capacitors are in the grip. The heaviest part is at the bottom of the gun (the capacitors). In comparison the battery pack is lightweight to them, but to balance the gun the battery is placed there to give the user a stable firing platform. Most all of the rest of the gun is either circuit boards or the focussing lens' /firing assembly. Heck most of the gun could be made out of lightweight thermoplastic as it doesn't have to withstand the repeated high levels of mechanical stress a ballistic pistol has to. There wouldn't be any kick to the weapon so the weight has to be distributed around the weapon in such a way to give the operator the reassurance that it is a proper weapon and not just a toy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robo Dojo 58 Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 (edited) he heaviest part is at the bottom of the gun (the capacitors). In comparison the battery pack is lightweight to them, but to balance the gun the battery is placed there to give the user a stable firing platform.Modern supercapacitors are made of aerogel,(lightest material ever) loaded with carbon dust. (also very light) They aren't that heavy, compared to Nickel-Metal-Hydride batteries. (solid metal/liquids)If you check out the reallife (but weak) gauss pistol in this thread, you'll notice that the batteries are in the handle, and the capacitors are everywhere else. Older capacitors were much heavier, because they were made of a metal coil and electrolyte liquid. The new supercapacitors are much lighter, and about 100K times better(no fooling!) for their size. --Edit: They're also much more expensive. Aerogel isn't cheap, but I dunno if it's 100K times more expensive...-- Edited February 3, 2004 by Robo Dojo 58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest drewid Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 I think we might be getting a bit too detailed here, seeing as we are building a 3d model rather than a working prototype. Q) Does the last one Mikker did >look< balanced. A) No it looks a bit barrel heavy Solution, make the grip a bit bigger . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breunor Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Something else affecting the look of your pics Mikker, change the camera focal length in your viewport. It looks like it's set to 65mm or something high, which warps the view when objects are close to the lens. Set it to 25-35 for a more realistic look. But on top of that, yeah the grip should become heavier compared to the barrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikker Posted February 4, 2004 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Something else affecting the look of your pics Mikker, change the camera focal length in your viewport. It looks like it's set to 65mm or something high, which warps the view when objects are close to the lens. Set it to 25-35 for a more realistic look. But on top of that, yeah the grip should become heavier compared to the barrel.i don't get what you mean....i havn't scaled any of my models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breunor Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 (edited) This is the same model viewed at the same angle. The left pic is taken at 65mm, the right side is at 25mm and zoomed back a little sit it would fit. As you can see the proportions are a little warped between them. I've seen a rifle that looked like it was bent in the middle because this setting was really high. If you pistol pics are taken at any kind of angle (barrel closer to the camera than the handle) and this setting is over 30, it will make the barrel look bigger than it really is. Edited February 4, 2004 by Breunor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts