[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I'm thinking that in Battlescape and Basescape that Xnet be run as a simulated PDA more-or-less as Xnet is envisioned now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I agree on Battlescape, but on Basescape? the player can read the regular xnet there. Maybe make the battlescape PDA to be available on all scapes? (base,planet,battle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I think we should flesh out the PDA version first then look into making a JAVA version that would run on the website (eventually with a C++ one being incorporated into the game) to generate interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I think we should flesh out the PDA version first then look into making a JAVA version that would run on the website (eventually with a C++ one being incorporated into the game) to generate interest.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Agree, a java version for the site would be nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I agree on Battlescape, but on Basescape? the player can read the regular xnet there. Maybe make the battlescape PDA to be available on all scapes? (base,planet,battle)Â IIRC basecape is just the base build/management screen. I was thinking the PDA would contain the consise info needed for that and be less distracting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 So the PDA would be available everywhere but on planetscape? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Well we /could/ put it there but it would be redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Ok, should we limit the viewable topics depending on which scape the player is in? i.e. only available topics for PDA on Basescape are Buildings, only available topics for PDA on Battlescape are Aliens/Weapons/XCAPs/etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Nah it's more work to do that, jsut run the full PDA simulation whereever you start it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Ok, should we limit the viewable topics depending on which scape the player is in? i.e. only available topics for PDA on Basescape are Buildings, only available topics for PDA on Battlescape are Aliens/Weapons/XCAPs/etcNo, why? Maybe the player want's to check, how much room in the storage an item takes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Ok, should we limit the viewable topics depending on which scape the player is in? i.e. only available topics for PDA on Basescape are Buildings, only available topics for PDA on Battlescape are Aliens/Weapons/XCAPs/etc<{POST_SNAPBACK}>No, why? Maybe the player want's to check, how much room in the storage an item takes.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>But Aliens and all as well?Just as a note, I'm not against having it all available at all times, just trying to define what exactly do we want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 The "Database" will be a "program" on it. But on the PDA it can be as we envisoned the Xnet before this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Ok, should we limit the viewable topics depending on which scape the player is in? i.e. only available topics for PDA on Basescape are Buildings, only available topics for PDA on Battlescape are Aliens/Weapons/XCAPs/etcNo, why? Maybe the player want's to check, how much room in the storage an item takes.But Aliens and all as well?Just as a note, I'm not against having it all available at all times, just trying to define what exactly do we want Well, no. aliens not on the basescape. But on the geoscape, pardon: Planetview.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I figure in battlescape because US soldier do carry these things and in basescape because architects and managers carry them too, but not geoscape since the full internet simulation will be there. BTW it'd be cool to have solitare on the PDA too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I figure in battlescape because US soldier do carry these things and in basescape because architects and managers carry them too, but not geoscape since the full internet simulation will be there. BTW it'd be cool to have solitare on the PDA too <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Would certainly be a nice extra, perhaps not too hard to code, too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 I figure in battlescape because US soldier do carry these things and in basescape because architects and managers carry them too, but not geoscape since the full internet simulation will be there. BTW it'd be cool to have solitare on the PDA too Yea. Might be a good idea. But won't you get lost, if you try to find sth. quick?(well, and solitare is a MUST ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 sth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 We can have a search engine that generates "hits". Since we have control of EVERYTHING we have the oportunity to cheat in the way a real search engine cant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 We can have a search engine that generates "hits". Since we have control of EVERYTHING we have the oportunity to cheat in the way a real search engine cant.Hm. might be getting too complex. But I don't know 'bout that. Nevertheless, a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j'ordos Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Do we really need a separate battlefield PDA? Wouldn't it be easier to let the player check everything from a laptop, thereby getting access to the entire xnet? Oh yeah, some minigames would be cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Do we really need a separate battlefield PDA? Wouldn't it be easier to let the player check everything from a laptop, thereby getting access to the entire xnet? Oh yeah, some minigames would be cool No, Laptop might be too bulky. Plus, the normal XNet entries are way to long and complicated for the battlefield. There you need short facts, not techno bable 'bout how the plasma rifle works. You just wanne know how big the hole are it leaves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Azrael Posted December 20, 2005 Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 Do we really need a separate battlefield PDA? Wouldn't it be easier to let the player check everything from a laptop, thereby getting access to the entire xnet? Oh yeah, some minigames would be cool <{POST_SNAPBACK}>No, Laptop might be too bulky. Plus, the normal XNet entries are way to long and complicated for the battlefield. There you need short facts, not techno bable 'bout how the plasma rifle works. You just wanne know how big the hole are it leaves...<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Exactly, maybe like an in-game strategy guide? we could integrate strategy tactics that would normally be on the manual, allowing the player to check them inside the game, on the battlescape (once we do have strategies to write, of course) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 PDA has less stuff, so less work to implement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[stewart] Posted December 29, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 Well Santa got me a post-christmas gift; an hx1950 iPaq; sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mad] Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 Well Santa got me a post-christmas gift; an hx1950 iPaq; sweet.sweet! So now you can do real life studies for us.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts